The bank that did this was shut down this year by the FDIC (this video is from back in April 2009). That bank is gone. That backhoe operator doesn’t normally tear down houses for a living.
Daniel was always VisionVictory.
People complained when he made videos talking about religion, so he made a new channel called Christian Red Pill to devote to issues of faith.
THEN he created a channel called VictoryIndependence that deals other things that don’t fit the VisionVictory economic channel (like preparedness, gardening, etc)
You squeaked on the operator of the machine…he will now lose his job. You did him in after he gave you information. You could have said “I have learned other homes are to be destroyed” and kept it confidential. Ever hear of Karma?
good thing they destroyed them …. they should have not been built anyways ….. empty homes like that attract crime …. my city tears down homes everyday …… for the simple fact that it attracts crime ….. but what a waste of materials …..
actually this video seems a little bias towards the condition of these homes. its not hard to see the home behind the home being demolished is at best about 30 percent complete. there are many homes across america in that condition. simple fact is there are more unfinished homes than will never be needed. a complete over building in other words. taking these houses out of the market may help existing home values retain or rise. the disaster was building these homes in the first place. good day.
I live near these places…(and this was posted in April…so why the link to LGF now?) and they were a blight. VV’s mistake was allowing builders to overbuild the area originally, causing a massive tip in our local real estate market.
Environmentalists, if they ever had an argument, should have made it about 2004…not when these were being torn down.
World Factbook info, California as an independent state, it would have had the 10th largest economy in the world in 2007.
July 09 California #1 foreclosures at 108K
U.S. 360,000 for 1 month!
Go To: Google maps, select REAL ESTATE @ right options box. Check FORECLOSURES, zip code 91739 and watch the search area w/PINS of homes in foreclosure. MINDBLOWING! zip 91739 the Inland Empire. Ground zero
CA CML RE @ 30% vacancy rate! 5 yr bloodbath more at: CaliforniaRE2009 blogspot
its crazy to read that someone would actually logically think that land would be worth more w/o houes on it. i dont care if someone smeared human shit all over the walls of those houses. you can still clean it up and fix it up. knocking the whole fucking thing down and throwing it away is like throwing money away. how could you think that the property is more w/o the houses? a house it self is value, shit condition or not. no research required about that. that mentality is very dangerous
It is really sad to see all of these comments based on pure emotions. Unfortunatly, this is business! Those houses were unable to be inhabited. They were torn apart and destroyed by homeless and people stealing all of the “gutts” of the houses. All you can see is one house, and the outside no less. Before you judge, become educated about the situation. FYI: Guaranty Bank did NOT take and TARP money…
heo87: There is still NO excuse for sending useable shit to a land fill. If your claims r true you could of let people salvage the materials. Your lack of compassion and failure to see the human side of this makes your organzation one that will soon be bankrupt and you will be unemployed. good luck to you. I can think of one less place you might be able to seek shelter should you find yourself homeless which seems likely if you have anything to do with a business that makes decisions like these.
Maybe you all should do your research before you get on your high horse and think you know the situation. 1. None of the homes we actually completely finished.2. Homeless and squaters were living in them, lowering the value by the minute.3. because they werent complete, people we coming in and taking things from the houses ie: appliances, carpet, windows, doors…you name it, they took it. 4. the property that the houses were built on…is worth more without the houses on it! Do your research!
There was an unsustainable building frenzy in Victorville. Prices have now dropped 50%. A home sold for $325K four years ago is now on the market for $175. Prices should never have gone so high, and wouldn’t have, if the bankers had done what they were supposed to do – to make sure that people could afford these escalated prices. But banks were making money on the quantity of loans and then shuffling them on to Wall Street.
Comments on VICTORVILLE MODEL HOMES DEMOLISHED – SHOCKING VIDEO: Part 5 »
Credit Unions are the way to go!
Boycott banks, keep you money in a safe. Banks are NOT your friendly neighborhood helper.
What a waste of money all this was.
Build all these houses and than tear them down? What a shame.
THANK GOD I HAVE SECTION 8
For updates, please visit the new VisionVictoryManifesto website.
The bank that did this was shut down this year by the FDIC (this video is from back in April 2009). That bank is gone. That backhoe operator doesn’t normally tear down houses for a living.
Daniel was always VisionVictory.
People complained when he made videos talking about religion, so he made a new channel called Christian Red Pill to devote to issues of faith.
THEN he created a channel called VictoryIndependence that deals other things that don’t fit the VisionVictory economic channel (like preparedness, gardening, etc)
You squeaked on the operator of the machine…he will now lose his job. You did him in after he gave you information. You could have said “I have learned other homes are to be destroyed” and kept it confidential. Ever hear of Karma?
good thing they destroyed them …. they should have not been built anyways ….. empty homes like that attract crime …. my city tears down homes everyday …… for the simple fact that it attracts crime ….. but what a waste of materials …..
actually this video seems a little bias towards the condition of these homes. its not hard to see the home behind the home being demolished is at best about 30 percent complete. there are many homes across america in that condition. simple fact is there are more unfinished homes than will never be needed. a complete over building in other words. taking these houses out of the market may help existing home values retain or rise. the disaster was building these homes in the first place. good day.
what happen to you youtube name VictoryIndependence?
now your visionvictory?
i dont understand government says the recession is over yet unemployment is down ….
That seems an odd way to create jobs…
He said Homes 13 times.
I live near these places…(and this was posted in April…so why the link to LGF now?) and they were a blight. VV’s mistake was allowing builders to overbuild the area originally, causing a massive tip in our local real estate market.
Environmentalists, if they ever had an argument, should have made it about 2004…not when these were being torn down.
Did anyone see how the local government made this happen with daily fines?
Why were they destroying these brand new homes, they should sell it for cheap instead of eating it with these machine.
World Factbook info, California as an independent state, it would have had the 10th largest economy in the world in 2007.
July 09 California #1 foreclosures at 108K
U.S. 360,000 for 1 month!
Go To: Google maps, select REAL ESTATE @ right options box. Check FORECLOSURES, zip code 91739 and watch the search area w/PINS of homes in foreclosure. MINDBLOWING! zip 91739 the Inland Empire. Ground zero
CA CML RE @ 30% vacancy rate! 5 yr bloodbath more at: CaliforniaRE2009 blogspot
It really is crazy. It shows just how crazy things are. Here you had perfectly useable houses. Hang the bastards. Bring back the guillotine.
its crazy to read that someone would actually logically think that land would be worth more w/o houes on it. i dont care if someone smeared human shit all over the walls of those houses. you can still clean it up and fix it up. knocking the whole fucking thing down and throwing it away is like throwing money away. how could you think that the property is more w/o the houses? a house it self is value, shit condition or not. no research required about that. that mentality is very dangerous
It is really sad to see all of these comments based on pure emotions. Unfortunatly, this is business! Those houses were unable to be inhabited. They were torn apart and destroyed by homeless and people stealing all of the “gutts” of the houses. All you can see is one house, and the outside no less. Before you judge, become educated about the situation. FYI: Guaranty Bank did NOT take and TARP money…
heo87: There is still NO excuse for sending useable shit to a land fill. If your claims r true you could of let people salvage the materials. Your lack of compassion and failure to see the human side of this makes your organzation one that will soon be bankrupt and you will be unemployed. good luck to you. I can think of one less place you might be able to seek shelter should you find yourself homeless which seems likely if you have anything to do with a business that makes decisions like these.
Maybe you all should do your research before you get on your high horse and think you know the situation. 1. None of the homes we actually completely finished.2. Homeless and squaters were living in them, lowering the value by the minute.3. because they werent complete, people we coming in and taking things from the houses ie: appliances, carpet, windows, doors…you name it, they took it. 4. the property that the houses were built on…is worth more without the houses on it! Do your research!
that sucked!! me and my family were wondering why. now we know, thats just stupid because no one even lived in them yet
There was an unsustainable building frenzy in Victorville. Prices have now dropped 50%. A home sold for $325K four years ago is now on the market for $175. Prices should never have gone so high, and wouldn’t have, if the bankers had done what they were supposed to do – to make sure that people could afford these escalated prices. But banks were making money on the quantity of loans and then shuffling them on to Wall Street.